Authentic investigative journalism and unfiltered creative commentary

Monday, September 8, 2025

We’re racing toward a future where AI agents talk like us, negotiate like us, even make decisions for us. But no one stopped to ask: who the hell are we trusting on the other end of the screen?

The conversation around AI has been hijacked by benchmarks and buzzwords. Bigger models. More tokens. Higher accuracy on tests designed by the same institutions getting steamrolled by the tech.

But while everyone’s busy fine-tuning the next GPT, they’re ignoring the real elephant in the datacenter: trust.

Because it turns out, when you can no longer tell whether you're talking to a person or a bot, knowing who you’re dealing with matters more than how “intelligent” they sound.

When AI agents are indistinguishable from humans, or from each other, trust is no longer a nice-to-have.

It becomes your security layer, your reputation system, your business risk mitigation strategy.

The AI landscape is already riddled with trust failures: You’ve got chatbots hallucinating credentials. Agents signing contracts on your behalf without a verifiable trace. Deepfakes doing influencer deals. Scammy LLM wrappers slinging affiliate links in Discord pretending to be “alpha.”

This isn’t theoretical risk — it’s live, right now, on every platform that ever said “automated for your convenience.”

Without built-in verifiability, AI systems create attack surfaces where identity, authorship, and authenticity are easily spoofed.

That’s where cheqd comes in.

Not with another model. Not with an AI-written blog about “ethical innovation.”

But with the infrastructure to make AI interactions trustworthy by design: decentralized identifiers (DIDs), verifiable credentials, trust registries, zero knowledge proof, and payments that embed trust into the bones of the system — not bolted on with legalese.

And here’s what that looks like in practice:

Let’s say a student signs up for an AI-powered tutor app that promises curriculum-certified help. The student presents a credential from their university confirming their enrollment. The AI tutor — let’s call it LearnBot — verifies it without phoning home to Google or logging into some creepy identity broker. Then LearnBot presents its own credential: it was created by a verified EdTech company, certified to teach the material, and hasn’t been tampered with. Everything checks out. Cryptographically, verifiably and before the first question is even asked. This isn’t a thought experiment.

This is what cheqd is enabling with agent credentials, Trust Registries, and machine-readable permissions. A world where both sides of the screen have receipts.

Imagine an AI agent that can prove who created it, what it's authorized to do, where its data came from, and who it’s acting on behalf of.

And imagine that all of this is cryptographically verifiable — by you, by other agents, by regulators if needed — without trusting some black-box API.

The next wave of AI innovation won’t come from bigger models alone. It will come from agents that can prove who they are, what they’re authorised to do, and who they represent — in a way that users, partners, and regulators can all trust.

Smarter models are inevitable.

Trustworthy ones? That’s the real innovation.

And cheqd is already laying the foundation.

A world where trust is embedded at the protocol level, not patched in after the fact.

*Sponsored article

•Holders of Trump’s Crypto Token Targeted by Hackers in Phishing Exploit [Read more]

•Cybercriminals Exploit X's Grok AI to Bypass Ad Protections and Spread Malware to Millions [Read more]

•Who Owns, Operates, and Develops Your VPN Matters: An analysis of transparency vs. anonymity in the VPN ecosystem, and implications for users [Read more]

•Malicious npm Packages Exploit Ethereum Smart Contracts to Target Crypto Developers [Read more]

•Telegram Security Best Practices [Read more]

•Why Proof of Reserves is Critical for Stablecoin Security
Stablecoins live and die by their backing. Without real reserves, your “digital dollar” is just a meme waiting to implode.

•BUNNI V2 EXPLOIT DRAINS $8.3M VIA LIQUIDITY FLAW
$8.3M vanished because of a decimal slip. The “Liquidity Distribution Function” didn’t balance, it bled. Every rebalance was just another payout to the thief.

•SlowMist: In-Depth Analysis of the $13 Million Venus User Hack
A Zoom call, a fake upgrade prompt, and $13M gone. Not code-level wizardry, just old-school social engineering dressed up for DeFi.

•Quantum-Safe Signatures For Web3: ML-DSA (CRYSTALS-Dilithium)
Bigger keys, fatter signatures, heavier chains — but still lighter than watching quantum computers erase Web3 history overnight.

•Marshal madness: A brief history of Ruby deserialization exploits
Ten years of patches, ten years of bypasses. Marshal bugs don’t die, they just respawn.

MGM’s $14B casino empire got wrecked by a teenager with a phone call. Six terabytes of data stolen, slot machines frozen, elevators dead — Alpha Black Cat ate through Vegas in 72 hours. A hundred million lost later, MGM proved the oldest exploit still works: humans are the weakest link.

We provide an anonymous platform for whistleblowers and DeFi detectives to present their information to the community. All authors remain anonymous. 
We are all rekt.